Entry engagement

Your MDM is live. The business still will not use it.

A short, fixed-price review of what was configured, what it is producing, and what would have to change for the golden record to be trusted. You keep the findings whether or not we work together afterwards.

Two to three weeks, fixed scope, fixed fee — no open-ended discovery

Reviewed by someone who has configured these platforms, not a generalist auditor

Prioritised by business impact, not a list of everything imperfect

Delivered as a roadmap you can execute with any partner, including your current one

Symptoms

Six signs a Health Check is worth its fee.

If two or more of these describe your programme, the underlying cause is usually configuration decisions taken early — and they are still fixable.

The business keeps its own spreadsheet

The clearest signal of all. When teams maintain a parallel list, they have already judged the golden record and found it wanting.

Records are merging that should not be

Over-matching destroys confidence faster than under-matching and is far harder to unwind. One wrongly merged customer can discredit an entire dataset.

The stewardship queue only grows

The platform is generating more tasks than the team can clear. Downstream, an unworked backlog is indistinguishable from bad data.

Go-live has slipped more than once

Usually a symptom of unresolved ownership rather than technical difficulty — a disagreement about who is authoritative, surfacing as a delivery problem.

Nobody can explain why two records merged

If the match logic is not explainable to a business owner, it will not be trusted by one, regardless of how well it performs statistically.

An AI or analytics initiative is blocked

The programme downstream has stopped, and the reason given is data quality — but nobody has isolated which definitions are actually in conflict.

The engagement

What a Health Check actually involves.

No discovery phase that turns into a project. A defined review, a written outcome, and a decision you can make with better information than you have now.

Duration

2–3 weeks

Investment

₹3.5L – ₹6L · $4,000 – $7,000

What you receive

Data model and domain review
Match rule analysis with measured precision and recall
Survivorship and trust hierarchy assessment
Stewardship workload versus team capacity
Integration and downstream consumption review
Data quality baseline and scorecard
Governance and ownership gap analysis
Prioritised risk register
Sequenced remediation roadmap
Executive readout session

Request a Health Check

Scope and fee depend on the number of domains and source systems in scope. We confirm both in writing before any work starts — there is no variable component.

How it runs

Three weeks, four checkpoints.

Scoping call

Forty-five minutes. Platform, domains, symptoms and who owns what. We confirm scope and fee in writing after this.

Access and review

Read-only access to configuration and a labelled data sample. Interviews with stewards and the business owners who consume the record.

Analysis

Match rules measured against the sample. Survivorship traced per attribute. Stewardship volume compared to real capacity.

Readout

Written findings, prioritised risks and a sequenced roadmap, presented to your team with the trade-offs made explicit.

What we will tell you, including when it is unwelcome

If the platform is configured correctly and the real problem is organizational — no agreed data owner, no mandate for stewardship, a business that was never consulted — we will say so, and a remediation project will not fix it. If your existing partner is doing good work and the issue is scope or sequencing, we will say that too. The report is worth more to you than the follow-on engagement is to us.

Two to three weeks to know where you actually stand.

Send us the platform, the domains in scope and what the business is saying. We will come back with a scope, a fee and dates — or tell you a Health Check is not what you need.

Reltio and Informatica are trademarks of their respective owners. VYLQORA implements, migrates and supports these platforms; naming them describes the technologies we work on and does not imply partnership, certification or endorsement by either vendor. Our platform recommendations are independent — we accept no commission, referral fee or incentive from any software vendor.